On Jan 28, 2024 at 9:04:44 AM, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 28 Jan 2024, at 22:54, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:“published as work in progress”
RFCs are published, normally by an RFC editor. Got DOI and pretty wide distribution.
"Drafted as a work in progress on <date>" would be better. I think title, date and version no so you have a chance of finding what was referred to for context are key.
I like this.
Note: Still in favor of 6-month expiration.
