Linda: Thanks for your review. > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8399bis-?? > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2024-01-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2024-01-02 > IESG Telechat date: 2024-01-18 > > Summary: the document is very clear on the changes to RFC8399. > > Major issues: > > RFC8399 documents the changes to RFC5280. This document obsolete the RFC8399. > does it mean all the changes documented in RFC8399 are not valid anymore? That is correct. As indicated by the title page: Obsoletes: 8399 (if approved) > It would be nicer to have a complete document incorporating all the changes, > such as in the appendix. So that new people can get the complete description > without going through many RFCs. This is a complete replacement for RFC 8399. I disagree that we should do an rfc5280bis at this time. Russ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
