About CRL version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: About CRL version
From: 朱文杰 <zwj2311625065@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:35:35 +0800

Hello,

After read RFC 5280, I have a question.

For a CRL, if the version field is omitted, what is its default version? Is it v1? I can't find any information about this in RFC 5280, also in RFC 2459 and 3280?

Please help me solve this confusion.

Sincerely thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: About CRL version
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: About CRL version
  - From: Stephen Farrell

Prev by Date: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-oam-framework-09
Next by Date: Re: [EXT] Re: IAB Statement on Encryption and Mandatory Client-side Scanning of Content
Previous by thread: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-08
Next by thread: Re: About CRL version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux