My bias is that having an expiry date is an excellent default position (for almost any and everything) -- but I promise not to make this a formal suggestion at least in the first year.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 12:40, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: no-draft-expiry@xxxxxxxx
Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/no-draft-expiry/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/no-draft-expiry
Purpose:
The no-draft-expiry mailing list discusses removing expiration dates from Internet-Drafts. The list will discuss what functions have historically depended on having expiration dates and what measures might better serve those functions if explicit expiration were removed. Measures might result in either procedural or tooling changes, such as improving the draft metadata in the Datatracker. This list may propose a BoF or it might just serve as the focus for discussion of drafts and tooling changes.
This list belongs to IETF area: GEN
For additional information, please contact the list administrators.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
