Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-07

["li_zhenqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx" <li_zhenqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Jean Mahoney,

Your review is appriciated and all the nits have been solved in the coming version, in which we will also solve all the comments received during the IESG Last Call. Thanks.

---

Best Regards,

Zhenqiang Li

China Mobile

li_zhenqiang@xxxxxxxxxxx

 

From: Jean Mahoney via Datatracker

Date: 2023-11-14 05:16

To: art@xxxxxxxx

CC: draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag.all; ippm; last-call

Subject: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-07

Reviewer: Jean Mahoney

Review result: Ready with Nits

 

Summary: This is a well written draft, and I think it's ready from an Artart perspective.

 

Nits:

 

Section 2. s/estabilished/established

 

 

Section 3.2. There appears to be a word missing in the following introductory phrase:

 

Current: "When receives a test packet, the micro OWAMP Session-Receiver MUST ..."

 

Perhaps: "When it receives..."

 

 

Section 5. Subject-verb agreement (s/use/uses):

 

Current: "The micro Session-Sender also use ..."

 

 

 

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call