Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2023 5:20 PM
> To: int-dir@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx;
> regext@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-
> 25
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> is safe.
>
> Reviewer: Dirk Von Hugo
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
> Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments
> just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and
> resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been
> received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see <https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1Z77o6KSr7heuMwkFMy1VEun9j_SIdKFujp9jEyM-
> 1ebhDmdRnYGnJ5NldTx-vPMn8QRDAfcAwnsWGNE-
> qF5lhhcjc1BB83RYTiAz0JdiCUgtbSFhzw3-DA8nZwCxDt8xZoRB11-o-9S-
> OLT6cRZC6Ukf5DVyadT4Oj2lpvrvFclr5L1mTPlpKCu3N2VZWNV3T0ZrZa7qdZ06
> 1PxlaIbaCh-
> Q2iinxD2n5V9vfPTQphg7hZ3NxbB4qT_C1Wt0Lfkt8TFJ8f8uUOypbGyEd0iHswI
> BNaZZjDbgJkTPdM7pr5I/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fgroup%2Fi
> ntdir%2Fabout%2F>.
>
> In Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) completed in 2015 a federated
> authentication service was up to now still undefined/unspecified - as already
> stated in RFC7481 on RDAP security services pointinhg already to OAuth
> authorization framework and OpenID as single sign-on authentication
> system. The mechanism proposed in this draft fills the gap and refers to 3
> PoC implementations based on earlier versions. It would be great if also a
> reference implementation to a more recent version could be provided IMO.

[SAH] Thanks for the review, Dirk! What's in the draft now is what we know. I don't think anyone has a fully implemented version of the specification.

> Overall the document seems quite complete and elaborated in version 25 to
> me and even only few very minor nits have been found: - mentioned "out-
> of-band"
> source, method, mechanism refers to entities outside the described RDAP
> system here, right? Not sure whether this usage of the term might be
> clarified... - re-using vs. reused: this should be used consistently IMO - (e.g.
> xyz => (e.g., xyz

[SAH] I'll check on these when I deal with the IESG feedback - thanks!

Scott
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux