"DTN has always been essentially a cross between email and routing"
I believe you are grossly mistaken here.
Regards
Jorge
As a secondary observation, (IMO) DTN has always been essentially a cross between email and routing. Aspects of the former have already been reinvented in DTN (to no particular benefit IMO) and the key remaining issues are routing. So I see no good reason to move it to INT vs one of those two (notably, at this time, routing).That’s probably not isolated - lots of WGs may be better suited to other areas, either by accident or by having an idea “shopped around” until an area accepts it - but that sort of cleanup should be ongoing, not part of a single one-time reconsideration such as this.Joe—Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologistOn Sep 10, 2023, at 12:27 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DTN to INT