Thank you, Brian, for your review. I have used your review to ballot a "no objection". Regards -éric On 18/07/2023, 22:35, "last-call on behalf of Brian Haberman via Datatracker" <last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx <mailto:last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of noreply@xxxxxxxx <mailto:noreply@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: Reviewer: Brian Haberman Review result: Ready I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>>. I reviewed this draft as a diff between it and RFC 3272. I found it well-written and ready for publication. I see no issues with the draft from an INT Area perspective. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx <mailto:last-call@xxxxxxxx> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call> -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
