Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, Duane!

Barry

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 5:14 PM Wessels, Duane <dwessels@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Barry for the good feedback.  I've updated our source document with the changes you've suggested.
>
> DW
>
> On 8/9/23, 1:10 PM, "Barry Leiba via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx <mailto:noreply@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Reviewer: Barry Leiba
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
>
> Thanks for a well-written document. I found the background information in
> Section 1.1 to be particularly interesting. Just a couple of very small
> editorial points there:
>
>
> operating system vendor was providing non-root trust anchors to the
> recursive resolver, which became out-of-date following the rollover.
>
>
> Nit: This use of “out of date” should not be hyphenated, as it’s not directly
> modifying anything (“out-of-date trust anchors” would be hyphenated, but “the
> trust anchors are out of date” would not be).
>
>
> In 2021, Verisign researchers used botnet query traffic to
> demonstrate that certain large, public recursive DNS services exhibit
> very high query rates when all authoritative name servers for a zone
> return REFUSED or SERVFAIL [botnet]. When configured normally, query
> rates for a single botnet domain averaged approximately 50 queries
> per second. However, when configured to return SERVFAIL, the query
> rate increased to 60,000 per second.
>
>
> In the two “when configured” phrases it’s not clear what was configured,
> normally and otherwise. Taken as written, it’s “query rates”, but those are
> clearly not things that get configured. In trying to figure out what you *are*
> referring to, I find that a reader could infer either “public recursive DNS
> services” or “authoritative name servers”. Let’s not make readers work that
> hard:
>
>
> NEW
> In 2021, Verisign researchers used botnet query traffic to
> demonstrate that certain large, public recursive DNS services exhibit
> very high query rates when all authoritative name servers for a zone
> return REFUSED or SERVFAIL [botnet]. When the authoritative servers
> were configured normally, query rates for a single botnet domain
> averaged approximately 50 queries per second. However, with the
> servers configured to return SERVFAIL, the query rate increased to
> 60,000 per second.
> END
>
>
> I have no other comments on the document, and I think it's ready to go.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux