Re: [Last-Call] [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 3, 2023 at 2:43:55 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I can think of two reasons why you would put them:

(1) If you want to write a query that works with JSONPath-base as well as an existing implementation that does require the parentheses.

(2) If you believe the parentheses increase readability (in general for a specific query, or possibly just to people that are used to the parentheses).


But I wouldn’t try to give guidance here for the same reasons I wouldn’t try to give guidance for return in C.

Um, I think you just did?  

I really do think that in RFCs, when there’s something that’s optional, it’s really better to say why it’s optional and what might motivate choosing one option or another. 


Grüße, Carsten

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux