On 02-Aug-23 08:12, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote on 01/08/2023 03:26:
I was under the illusion that RFC1984 + RFC2804 made this point quite
clear.
Do you think we need an RFC that says more?
The contents of rfc1984 aged well. One potential addition: the current
round of proposals include suggestions to fillet various classes of
encryption clients, for example personal messaging systems. This is
slightly different to the topics discussed in rfc1984, but in the
current round of encryption angst, no less of a problem.
Correct. Those two RFCs don't talk about backdoors in the host, for example.
Neither does RFC7258.
Who's going to write the draft, and will the IETF+IESG support it?
Brian
