Hi Will, I’m not sure what happened with the scheduling of this review, but this document is already an RFC (since January).
I’m glad you feel it is ready for publication.
Thanks, Acee On Jul 25, 2023, at 06:27, Will LIU via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Will LIU
Review result: Ready
Hi all,
I have reviewed draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13 as part of the
Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being
processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of
improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not
addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.
“ When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router
(LSR) or a server participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol
(IGP), its presence and path computation capabilities can be
advertised using IGP flooding. The IGP extensions for PCE Discovery
(PCED) (RFCs 5088 and 5089) define a method to advertise path
computation capabilities using IGP flooding for OSPF and IS-IS,
respectively. However, these specifications lack a method to
advertise Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
security (e.g., Transport Layer Security (TLS) and TCP Authentication
Option (TCP-AO)) support capability.”
My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication.
** Technical **
No.
** Editorial **
No.
(I thought I finished my review for version -10, however, it seems the second
round of review was missed by me)
Regards,
Will (Shucheng LIU)
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
