Ah, so I stand corrected. It looks like there was no discussion of draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps in the telechat meeting (2017-05-25), as per the narrative minutes. Regards, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: 11 July 2023 04:43 To: Michael Thomas <mike@xxxxxxxx>; Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxx>; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: RFC 8252 [Process and reviews] No need to ask: https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/minutes/ On 11-Jul-23 13:16, Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 7/10/23 5:59 PM, Lloyd W wrote: >> Why speculate? >> >> Ask to see relevant IESG minutes. > > How do you do that? > > Mike > >> >> Lloyd Wood >> lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> On 11 Jul 2023, at 03:15, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I can imagine that there was perhaps a discussion in the IESG about how doing it in the browser it better than doing it in the app, and probably an augment that OAUTH is more secure than the apps individually managing passwords. So, rightly or wrongly, they may have deemed that publishing this to not be perfect, but better than the alternatives. >
