Hi Tianran,
Thanks for your feedback.
Please see my reply inline below (in blue).
Best.
Neta
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 6:06 AM Tianran Zhou via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Tianran Zhou
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
This document is well written, and is ready for publication.
Only a couple of nits, for the authors consideration:
1. In the abstraction and introduction, you state "Since it does not affect the
wire protocol, the Khronos mechanism is applicable to any current or future
time protocol." I do not think "any" make sense here. This document only
applies Khronos to NTPv4. You may say, it "could be applied to other time
protocol".
>> I rephrased the sentence without the word “any”.
2. Khronos is a technique firstly described in one paper. I would
like to see the reference at the first place, e.g., in the introduction.
>> The RFC extends the paper with respect to watchdog and system design, we mentioned the paper in the introduction with respect to the formal analysis.
Best,
Tianran
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
