|
Hi Michael, On 05/06/2023, 19:05, "Michael Welzl"
michawe@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I want to thank you very much for this extremely detailed review, and > also apologize for not answering this for so long - it has somehow > fallen through the cracks as we dealt with all the reviews, in fact > because it arrived so early! We merged your PR but I forgot that > there was also a much longer email somewhere in one of my mail > folders… I take this blame! No problems at all :-) > I have now opened issues in our github repository on these matters: >
https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues > > ... and we’ll deal with them one by one, there. Please feel free to > comment there - and many thanks again! Sure I am going to follow the discussion there, and thank you for taking my comments into consideration. BTW, I think in my review I forgot to mention that this document contains great stuff and it's high quality. So a big thank you to all TAPS folks who worked on it. Also, IIRC, a few years ago, the NEAT project had one of its early meetings in our office in Cambridge? I was in charge with the logistics and I remember going to the Italian deli to place the order for your lunch. I reckon I probably deserve an ACK for the panini :-) Cheers, t |
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
