[Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty
Review result: Has Nits

The security considerations could be slightly expanded to refer to the
"encrypted mode" and "authenticated mode" that is referenced from RFC8545
security considerations. Perhaps a direct reference to where those are
specified would be better than the current reference as that just states in the
security considerations section that they are recommended, but that document
does not define those options. The reader would then be able to jump to those
documents/sections rather than having to take multiple steps to see what the
additional security options include.

The limit on where this protocol used provides good context. It's also good
that the integrity protection is built-in. I appreciate the working group and
authors efforts to build-in security options. Well done!


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux