Robert, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Apr 27, 2023, at 23:09, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2023-04-27 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-03 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > Ready for publication as a proposed standard rfc but with nits to consider > before publication. > > Nits: > 1) It would be nice to explain when/how the registries got renamed? > > 2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the > shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs can > do this). Otherwise it adds to the list of URLs that we have to keep alive > forever. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
