Hi Martin, Thanks for your review. I’ve addressed your comments in the -18 version. Thanks, Acee > On May 4, 2023, at 3:53 AM, Martin Björklund via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Martin Björklund > Review result: Ready > > This is the third YANG doctor review of this document (I have reviewed -17). > All comments from my previous review have been addressed. > > So, I have only two very minor comments. > > o The "description" of the YANG module now reads: > > This document defines a YANG data model which extends > the RIBs defined in ietf-routing YANG module with more > route attributes. > > In the module itself, we usually write "This YANG module ...". So perhaps simply > > This YANG module extends the RIBs defined in the 'ietf-routing' YANG module > with more route attributes. > > o Use single quotes to refer to schema nodes. > > The "description" of the leaf "routes" has: > > "Total routes for protocol in the RIB."; > > This looks odd, the grammar is not correct. Then I realized that the word "protocol" refers > to the leaf "protocol". So I suggest: > > "Total routes for 'protocol' in the RIB."; > > The same comment applies to some other descriptions as well. > > > > /martin > > > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call