Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ines, thank you for your review! I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Lars

> On 10. Apr 2023, at 21:57, Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-10
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2023-04-10
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-04-10
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document defines a new Traffic Selector (TS) Type for Internet Key
> Exchange version 2 to add support for negotiating Mandatory Access Control
> (MAC) security labels as a traffic selector of the Security Policy Database
> (SPD).  The new TS type is TS_SECLABEL.
> 
> The document is well written and easy to read.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Section 3.2: "198.51.0/24" --> "198.51.100.0/24" ?
> 
> Question: Section 2.1, the Security Label should be at least of one octet. Is
> there a limit of octets for this field?
> 
> Thank you for this document,
> 
> Ines.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux