Re: [Masque] WG Review: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption (masque)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 21/04/2023 12:01, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
In a case like the one below, it would be extremely helpful to have a (pointer to a) diff between the current and the proposed charter.

Is that not [1]?

You get to that via the datatracker wg page [2] via
the link for charter text [3]

S.

[1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-masque%2Fwithmilestones-01.txt&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-masque%2Fwithmilestones-01-01.txt&difftype=--html
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/masque/about/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-masque/history/

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux