Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-03.txt> (Update to OSPF Terminology) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree and believe the suggested text is fine. 
Acee

> On Apr 21, 2023, at 6:59 AM, Alvaro Retana <alvaro.retana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Adrian!
> 
> Yes, I think that makes sense.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro. 
> 
> On April 19, 2023 at 5:47:49 PM, Adrian Farrel (adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi, 
>> 
>> Just a quick comment in last call for this draft. 
>> 
>> Would it be a good idea to also give some steer to future documents? 
>> 
>> Something like "It is intended that all future OSPF documents use this 
>> revised terminology even when they reference the RFCs updated by this 
>> document." 
>> 
>> That could go in the Abstract and Introduction. 
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> Adrian 


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux