| Hi, David,
I’m fine with how the congestion control issue has been resolved.
I think the doc should include some discussion of how it would be used, which can include a router bundled with implementations.
However, my advice to the INTAREA ADs is that router functions must not be included *as part of the tunnel spec*. I don’t want to have to add this to draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels as a counterexample or with updates.
Joe
— Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist www.strayalpha.com
On Apr 20, 2023, at 10:26 AM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thank you for the very productive discussion around this draft. We've landed the majority of your feedback as changes into the document that are reflected in draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-12. However, there remain two points: 1) inclusion of text that applies to routers that we see as important implementer advice instead of implementation-specific advice about TUN interfaces 2) whether disabling congestion control is a MAY or a SHOULD And for those, we're going to have to agree to disagree. The conversation was definitely interesting, but at this point I don't think we'll reach agreement on them.
Thanks, David
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
