Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Ready document: draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh-11.txt reviewer: Susan Hares reviewer expertise: Routing, general awareness of SFC and NSH, not an IOAM expert. review focus: OPS-DIR - operational AFIL, the document is consistent within the text and with documents referenced. I have read https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-05, but I am not an expert in the deployment considerations. I recommend that someone review this text who is a expert in deployment considerations. Only two sentences had editorial issues that the authors might want to review: Section 3. sentence 2. The phrase "the different IOAM-Data-Fields" made the logic difficult to follow. However, it may be the best phrase for the technology. Appendix A, paragraph 4 (starts Total length), the second sentence has a grammatical roughness. Here's the roughness Current text: If for example [text], then text. normal mechanisms use: For example, if -----, then ---- I have not flagged these issues as a nit, but the authors might want to review check these before getting IESG reviews. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
