fwiw - the IPR wg did decided that any information is better than no information
Scott
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 12:19 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> point out, making fields -- especially the patent or application
> number -- mandatory is unreasonable because the discloser cannot
> tell you what they don't know and we should not be doing
> anything that discourages such disclosures.
>
> I am far from confident that this ("do not discourage") attitude is the right one to have. The LLC and its counsel should decide if we really want to have people saying "I think this patent reads against RFC xxx"
>
