On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:22 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here, the document defines a Media Type, so that's presumably for interchange. The issue is that both ES404 and RFC8259 describe or allow unpaired surrogates, with ES404 making some other additional processing requirements.
Hi, sorry, it should have been "... with ECMA-262 and later making some other additional processing requirements."
I know some people don't like what those specs do, but it's not "unpredictable". If you have to deal with browsers, it's best to follow the ECMAScript spec for the JSON object.
Maybe the YAML media type shouldn't get into that.
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
