Re: non-solution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Ed Gerck wrote:

>
>
> shogunx wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 23-jun-04, at 3:54, Ed Gerck wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Of course, I still believe that insisting in only using the email
> >>>for communications and screaming "bloody murder" when it does not
> >>>work for some reason, at some time, is very un-Internet. If you want
> >>>only a single path, you have to live with the resulting single point of
> >>>failure. Allowing web-based messages in addition to email is a simple
> >>>and cost-effective way to provide redundancy and reduce the importance
> >>>of problems such as reported by Anderson.
> >>
> >>The IETF has used email as its primary method of conducting its
> >>business for almost 20 years. The IETF is also in charge of all the
> >>relevant standards. So if email doesn't work, I think the IETF should
> >>fix it rather than come up with ad-hoc additional communication
> >>mechanisms that have more than enough problems of their own.
> >
> >
> > I am in agreement that the mailing list mechanism should not be
> > tampered with... it works, so don't break it.
>
> What I suggested could easily and seamlessly merge with the mailing
> list, as an email that was received by a web interface.
>

What are you suggesting, a web-based archive of list traffic and a form on
a website to post to ietf lists?


> BTW, I'm glad you are in the first phase of problem solving -- denial.
> I'm suggesting we move to the second phase -- investigate options to
> solve the problem.
>

Please define the problem that you are attempting to solve.


>
>

sleekfreak pirate broadcast
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]