Hi Bo,
Thanks for your review. I’ve responded in line below.
> On Dec 1, 2022, at 7:50 AM, Bo Wu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> Question 1: In the current version, only RFC 6368 is mentioned in Updates.
> Would RFC 4724 also need to be updated?
I don’t think so — the operation of Graceful Restart (RFC 4724) is unaffected by this spec. There are considerations for RFC 6368, though, which is why it’s listed in the Updates.
> Question 2: Would RFC6368 be in the normative reference?
Good catch, thanks, I moved it.
> Question 3: Is there a suggested default value for Long-lived Stale Time?
No. I made this update in version 03 (last sentence is added):
Long-lived Stale Time:
This time (in seconds) specifies how long stale information
(for the AFI/SAFI) may be retained (in conjunction with the
period specified by the "Restart Time" in the Graceful Restart
Capability). Because the potential use cases for this
extension vary widely, there is no suggested default value for
the LLST.
Regards,
—John
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
