Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir last call review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: Standard
Johan,

Thank you for your review!  I kind of shot from the hip for writing up this example and did not actually test it in bind.  Is the following what you are looking for?

      foo.example.com. IN IPSECKEY (
            10 0 4 . 3WTXgUvpn1RlCXnm80gGY2LZ/ErUUEZtZ33IDi8yfhM= )


Bob

On 11/17/22 04:38, Johan Stenstam via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Johan Stenstam
Review result: Ready with Nits

I'm the assigned reviewer of the DNS Directorate for this draft.
This document does reference the DNS, as it contains an update to the
defined algorithms for the DNS resource record IPSECKEY.

The reviewer is familiar with IPSECKEY and he has no objections to
the draft, everything is fine.

A single formatting nit has been noted:

In Appendix A the example IPSECKEY RR is split over two lines of text.
This is fine, but it would be preferable if the open parenthesis,
after "IPSECKEY" and before "10", was on the first line rather than
after the line break to make the example conform to standard processing
rules for DNS data in text representation.

For the same reason it would be good if the second line was indented.

Finally, I suggest a terminating dot on "foo.example.com".



--
Robert Moskowitz
Owner
HTT Consulting
C:      248-219-2059
F:      248-968-2824
E:      rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux