hello carsten.
On 2022-11-03 14:40, Carsten Bormann wrote:
either we remove the guidance, or we can add a note saying that for those URIs, fragment identification will not work. my preference is for the latter, because it would be useful to end up on the registry page.
Yes, we can take away the surprise by saying that.
just making sure we're properly addressing your review feedback: if we
leave the recommendation to use the URIs, but explicitly add a note
saying that those URIs (for now) are not fully resolved as they ideally
should be, that addresses your issue?
thanks and cheers,
dret.
--
Erik Wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@xxxxxxxx |
| https://youtube.com/ErikWilde |
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
