Dear Johan,
Sorry for our delay. We want to thank you for your review. We are publishing version 13 with all the IESG review inputs.
We have corrected the nits you bring out see the link.
Ana & Edgar
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:51 PM Johan Stenstam via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Johan Stenstam
Review result: Ready with Nits
The document is extremely acronym dense, which makes it hard to read
for a non-expert reader. However, I do understand that this is nearly
impossible to avoid in this area.
That said, after reading this a couple of times, I think I understand
enough of the topic matter to agree with the way it is presented.
This document does not reference the DNS, and has no considerations
that reflect on the DNS.
A couple of nits, feel free to ignore:
1. 5.4.2. Fragmentation Parameters: Typo (I think): "... bigger than
304 bits using a 16 bits- Header_size". Should be "... 16 bit
Header_size", in analogy with prior section.
2. 5.4.2. Fragmentation Parameters: Redundant line: "W 2 or 3 bits."
3. Both Appendix A and B has a redundant "Appendix" in the title that
could be removed.
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
