I've noticed that Rob Austein continues to use sra@xxxxxxx for his work as WG co-chair. I think I've been very patient, and have held off on legal recourse so far. Dean Anderson Av8 Internet, Inc ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:14:39 +0930 From: Mark Smith <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> Cc: harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Response to complaint from Dean Anderson On Wed, 19 May 2004 23:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > <snip - whole lot of legal stuff that I don't have time to read - I've got a few thousand RFCs to go ...> Firstly, let me say that it is really sad that legalease, legal council and legal positions have appeared on an IETF mailing list to the extent we've seen. I've understood that the IETF was all about best technical solutions and positions, not best legal solutions and positions. Dean, I'm in no position to implement this as a solution (nor have I spent time thinking about how hard or easy it would be to implement), however, presuming that @ietf.org doesn't implement MTA blocking via methods such as SORBS, and I don't think they do, would you be happy if all people who have official IETF positions (eg. area advisor, working group chair, etc) had @ietf.org email addresses, and used those for any IETF related correspondence ? Regards, Mark. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf