On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 3:19 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Abstract
The document marks as historic any "int" domain names that were
designated for infrastructure purposes, and identifies them for
removal from the "int" top-level domain. Any implementation that
involves these domains should be considered deprecated. This
document also marks RFC 1528 and RFC 1706 as historic..
I'm interested in the rationale for RFC 1528 being marked as historic and not also RFC 1529, RFC 1530, and RFC 1703. They also seem to be relevant to "tpc.int."
Thanks
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
