Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Roni!

The old algorithms GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-2001 are considered obsolete. They are now replaced with GOST R 34.10-2012 (digital signature) and GOST R 34.11-2012 (hash function). Basically, the use of GOST algorithms in DNSSEC remains the same as described in RFC 5933, but it is necessary to replace them with the new ones. Old algorithms should not be used anymore. That's why we need to obsolete RFC 5933.

The section "IANA Considerations" proposes to assign numbers for GOST R 34.10-2012 and GOST R 34.11-2012 in the IANA registries "DNS Security Algorithm Numbers" (https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml) and "Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR) Type Digest Algorithms" (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml).

Updates for RFC 8624 are described in the corresponding Section.

--
Boris


13.10.2022 14:41, Roni Even via Datatracker writes:
> Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review > Date: 2022-10-13 IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-19 IESG Telechat date: Not > scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: the document is almost ready for publication as some type of > an RFC > > Major issues: The document is meant to be an informational RFC > obsoleting RFC5933 a standard track RFC. why is this change. > > Minor issues: > > the directive in the IANA consideration "The entry for Value 3, > GOST R 34.11-94 should be updated to have its Status changed to '-'" > is not clear. there is no status field in the table as I see in > RFC8624 section 3.3 > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > >
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux