Martin, Thanks for clarifying, and no I'm not going to insist. ~ J > On 10 Oct 2022, at 20:58, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > James, > > Thanks for the review! > > I honestly don't think it's a big deal either way -- I'll add either normative word if you insist, but I don't think a requirement is necessary here and it flows a bit better this way in my opinion. "ignore" is obviously a pretty loose word to use -- it would certainly be OK for a client to log it or something. > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 7:43 AM James Gruessing via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reviewer: James Gruessing > Review result: Ready > > This is my review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05 as part of ART Last Call review. > > Overall this is a well written document that is clear in its writing, and I > have only one minor point of clarification. > > Section 4.1 - "The client ignores Retry packets using other versions." - is > this supposed to be a normative phrase, i.e. "The client SHOULD/MUST ignore > Retry packets"? This sentence feels out of place in a paragraph with normative > text defining other requirements. Or is this a behaviour defined in VN that I > have missed? > > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
