RE: E911 location services (CAS system too)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>     If you -really- want this
> 	to work, you need to be able to trust what the DNS gives you.
> 
> 
> --bill

If (this is a BIG if):

1) this so called CAS system were implemented
2) DNS chose to use the CAS system to provide DNS server digital
   certificates
3) DNS servers would sign queries.  I mean server signatures as in
   non-repudiation that the response originally came from the
   authorized DNS server.

I'm trying to say that you could trust what DNS gives you.  Of course,
the trust is only as good as the protection of the private key and the
technology providing PKI.  I'm relying upon the reading I have done
that simply states that a third party verified digital signature can
provide nonrepudiation. I think the CAS system could be used to
reliably establish the DNS "trust anchor" because CAS becomes the
third party verifier between a DNS resolver and a requesting computer.

Sounds like this is an uphill battle.  I believe that a CAS system
does have merit.

Sal
Salvatore Mangiapane

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]