Let’s be fair. Lloyd was responding to Dan, not the BCP 83 last call. Yeah, the response could have been more diplomatic, but this subthread isn’t an inherent part of the BCP 83 process, and could have just as easily arisen on any *other* mailing list Dan was posting in. /a > On Oct 5, 2022, at 01:21, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 05.10.22 08:03, Lloyd W wrote: >>>> On 5 Oct 2022, at 16:39, Dan Harkins <dharkins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Histrionics are not helpful right here and right now. >> ...says man with long recorded history of resorting to histrionics. > > And this is my problem with BCP 83. We should be evaluating the messages, not the man. > > Eliot > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: Binary data
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
