Re: [Last-Call] [sipcore] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-multiple-reasons-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Todd

I agree - the draft could provide few examples of where we would use SIP Reason header with multiple protocol values in the same SIP response 

Regards
Ranjit

-----Original Message-----
From: sipcore <sipcore-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Todd Herr via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 9:51 AM
To: art@xxxxxxxx
Cc: draft-ietf-sipcore-multiple-reasons.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; sipcore@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [sipcore] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-multiple-reasons-01

Reviewer: Todd Herr
Review result: Ready with Nits

As someone unfamiliar with SIP Reason Header Fields, I'm of the opinion that perhaps an example of a header field with multiple values might be instructive as a contrast to the examples shown in RFC 3326, but I do not feel strongly enough about this to hold up the document.


_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
sipcore@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux