That suffices for the document and my review. Whether it suffices for
the community and IESG is up to them. (I wonder about the precedent of
defining MIBs for monitoring every new thing we do. But that is up to
others, not something you can fix in this document.)
Yours,
Joel
On 9/29/2022 10:25 AM, Don Fedyk wrote:
Hi Joel
The reason this was requested by the community is that there is SNMP management equipment deployed that they would like to be able use for monitoring IP-TFS.
I suggest I add this text to clearify.
OLD:
The objects defined here are the same as [I-D.ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs] with the exception that only operational data is supported. This module uses the YANG model as a reference point for managed objects. Note an IETF MIB model for IPsec was never standardized however the structures here could be adapted to existing MIB implementations.
NEW:
The objects defined here are the same as [I-D.ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs] with the exception that only operational data is supported. By making operational data accessible via SNMP existing network management systems can monitor IP-TFS. This module uses the YANG model as a reference point for managed objects. Note an IETF MIB model for IPsec was never standardized however the structures here could be adapted to existing MIB implementations.
Doses that suffice?
Thanks
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 6:50 PM
To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs.all@xxxxxxxx; ipsec@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2022-09-21
IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-04
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: Assuming a reasonable answer to one question, this document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
Major issues:
The one question I have is "why?" I could not find anywhere in the
document any explanation of why we are defining an SNMP MIB for monitoring
ipsecme, nor the equivalent why an operator would choose to use this MIB
instead of the YANG based model that it is based upon.
Minor issues: N/A
Nits/editorial comments: N/A
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
