Re: IPv6 adoption - IPv10 is the future.

[Tom Beecher <beecher@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes Tom, it describes the mission of the IETF and all its activities and how things goes with the IETF, but I think we should give some space for any internet draft to be discussed and reviewed and then decide, IPv10 didn’t take the full chance to be discussed or reviewed here, and this is what I’m looking for, the good minds here can add something valuable to the draft or correct something, but not to discard the draft at all.

I believe your expectations of how the process works may not align with how they actually do. Submission of a draft doesn't automatically start something on the way to becoming a standard. You need to work with others that believe the draft has merit, and start to form the official groups that start the process. It is not an org where you submit an idea and wait for others to do something with it. It requires active participation and collaboration with others. 

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 5:54 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes Tom, it describes the mission of the IETF and all its activities and how things goes with the IETF, but I think we should give some space for any internet draft to be discussed and reviewed and then decide, IPv10 didn’t take the full chance to be discussed or reviewed here, and this is what I’m looking for, the good minds here can add something valuable to the draft or correct something, but not to discard the draft at all.

 

Khaled Omar

 

From: Tom Beecher <beecher@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 8:23 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IPv6 adoption - IPv10 is the future.

 

I don’t know why till now the IETF didn’t take the IPv10 draft seriously into consideration 

 

You would likely get some benefit reviewing this document : https://www.ietf.org/about/participate/tao/ 

 

 

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 1:14 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi IETFers,

 

I still see no progress happens in the IPv6 deployment all over the world and 5 years ago when we started to do analysis we found out now that the migration process going so slow and now the percentage according to google hits 40% which gives an alarm of the internet division due to finding blocks of IPv6 only hosts and IPv4 only hosts in the internet.

 

 

I don’t know why till now the IETF didn’t take the IPv10 draft seriously into consideration as it would be applied since it was developed and it wouldn’t take so much time to be deployed in the internet.

 

I still see no better solution, not because I’m the IPv10 I-D author, but because I keep watching what’s going on on the internet and I see the red flag case will be raised soon due to the incompatibility between IPv4 and IPv6.

 

I hope I get positive replies because of course I’m not aware with everything happening at the IETF.

 

Have a good day everyone.

 

Best regards,

 

Khaled Omar

Senior Service Delivery Engineer

DELL Technologies, Egypt