Vijay, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-8-12, at 21:50, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-?? > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: 2022-08-12 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-17 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Draft is ready with nits for a Proposed Standard. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 1 (please see below) > > Nits/editorial comments: 4 (please see below) > > Minor: > - Sec. 3.6: Note that Type is "TBD" here. Should this be 1046, as shown in > Table 1? (Or is the use of 1046 still under discussion?) > > Nits: > - I note that certain acronyms --- IGP, NLRI, ASLA --- are not defined. I > suspect that these are well-known in the community, hence need no definition. > Just in case they are not, you may consider expanding the rare ones on first > use. - Sec. 1: s/Flexible algorithm is called so as/Flexible algorithm is so > called because/ - Sec. 2: s/Definition(s) (FAD) advertised by a node > is/Definition(s) (FAD) advertised by a node is (are)/ > Reason: symmetry in the sentence construction > - Sec. 3.6: Is Figure 7 missing the trailing "//" for sub-TLV tpes? > > Thanks. > > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
