Hi,
Can you provide more context regarding what's the issue here?
Is this related to the folks that were not elligible due to being part
of the ISOC board?
And the objection is against picking "the net folk" in the list, as
opposed to pick another random number? Or what?
Thanks,
Fernando
On 17/8/22 11:45, NomCom Chair 2022 wrote:
FYI. I will not name the person, they can self-identify if they wish.
At this point, it is probably best for me to not comment publicly on the matter under appeal unless Andrew or his delegate asks me.
-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 10:33 AM
To:
Subject: Re: One week left to object
Looking at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8713.html#section-4.17
“The Chair has 48 hours to review the challenge and offer a resolution to the member. If the resolution is not accepted by the member, that member may report the challenge according to the dispute resolution process stated elsewhere in this document.”
My proposed resolution is to use the existing list and seeds and to pick the next candidate. Since that is what you are objecting to, I assume you will not find that acceptable, so your next step is to contact the ISOC president, as outlined in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8713.html#name-dispute-resolution-process
-------------------------------------------------------------
From:
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 5:12 PM
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: One week left to object
I object to "go down the list".
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494
