Michael StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/16/2022 5:35 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Eric Rescorla <ekr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> qualified volunteer. They have
>> no control over who they could >> transfer to, their only choice is to
>> transfer or not.
>>
>> > Correct, but they get to look at the next person on the list.
>>
>> Given the two from one org limit, what's the attack here?
> DId you already forget what happened last time around? E.g. I'm the
> second member from a company, and the 11th person is the third member.
> I decline to serve, the other guy picks it up and the company doesn't
> lose a slot.
I'm still actually lost.
The company still has only two people, right?
It's just not the same two people. How is it a win?
Why would 11th person be more or less honest than you?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
