Just a nit - it'd be good to update the abstract, because the document is doing considerably more than it claims. Cheers, > On 4 Aug 2022, at 11:43 pm, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'WebP Image Format Media Type Registration' > <draft-zern-webp-09.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2022-09-01. Exceptionally, comments may > be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > This is a second Last Call for this document due to substantive changes > since the previous version. > > Abstract > > > This document provides the Media Type Registration for the subtype > image/webp. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zern-webp/ > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
