On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:32 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 19:48 Peter Gutmann <pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>The TLS 1.3 adoption document you reference seems to be based solely on Web
>browser data:Firstly, this comment is not true. The document covers many interactions. There are non-browser clients, embedded products, and server-to-server interactions in there.
Here is a more recent report:
I definitely agree that there are valid reasons to support 1.2. Further, the document does a good job of explaining how to do that. I just don't see a reason to require 1.2.
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
