Thanks for spotting the typo. I've added a correction to the editor's copy [1].
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 1:26 PM Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Carlos Bernardos
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.
Based on my review, the document is ready. I’m not an expert on SVCB, and I had
to browse to the main SVCB document while doing the review.
I have not found any major issue. The following are minor issues (typos,
misspelling, minor text improvements) with the document:
- Nit:
OLD TEXT:
When the binding authority specifies a non-default port number, Port-
Prefix Naming places the port number in an additional a prefix on the
name.
NEW TEXT:
When the binding authority specifies a non-default port number, Port-
Prefix Naming places the port number in an additional prefix on the
name.
Thanks,
Carlos
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
