> Defining an alternate approach in sufficient detail to say it should or should not be preferred seems a bit out of scope here, IMO. +1. There has already been active discussion about defining alternative approaches to DDR for future drafts, including Ben’s draft. I do not think DDR should try to preclude whatever the WG may feel is appropriate for a future draft, just
stick to what is appropriate for DDR. Thanks, Tommy |
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call