Hi John, On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 9:27 PM John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > p.s., since I'm guilty of suggesting the explanatory paragraph, > I'd be willing to work with you, Carsten, or others on getting a > draft version together if that would help. That'd be great. Extrapolating from a previous email of yours: > I think the document would be strengthened by a brief paragraph about > possible updates, pointing out that Tag 38 and the rest of the spec > might be altered separately and urging that any updating documents be > clear about what is being altered (and what is not) and that any > replacement document either copy everything or split things up. That > might include an explicit warning against leaving parts of this spec > as normative while replacing other parts. Could you take a stab at drafting a proposal that we can then tweak together? Cheers, TIA -- Thomas -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
