Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It appears that Keith Moore  <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> The best solution will almost always be the responsible AD making a judgment call
>> as to whether an additional Last Call is needed and erring on
>> the side of doing one when there is doubt.
>
>It's not the "almost always" cases that I'm concerned about, but the 
>other cases.
>
>IOW, a statistical argument isn't convincing here.

Here's a statistical argument: if we made a new rule that all
modified drafts had to go through last call again, and 95% of those
drafts had only trivial changes, looking at modified drafts would
nearly always be a waste of time, so people won't look at any of them.

If you're saying that ADs do a bad job of managing their documents,
that is a conversation we can have, but in a world of limited time I
would prefer to let them pick the ones to rerun so it's more likely
people will pay attention.

R's,
John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux