Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-problem-details-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yoav,

Thank you for the reminder to be specific in Security Considerations sections!

This meshes well with Harald’s comments.  As mentioned in our response there, we added a brief Privacy Considerations section and expanded the Security Considerations section in https://github.com/core-wg/core-problem-details/pull/34—; editor’s copy at https://core-wg.github.io/core-problem-details/privcons-seccons/draft-ietf-core-problem-details.html#name-privacy-considerations).

We think that this should address your observations.

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2022-06-14, at 22:36, Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Yoav Nir
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> Greetings
> 
> The document defines a CBOR-encoded problem details structure, similar to the
> JSON- or XML-encoded structure defined in RFC 7807. As such, the security
> considerations for it mostly mirror those of RFC 7807, and that is all that the
> Security Considerations section says.  Following this reference, the Security
> Considerations section of 7807 urges caution when defining new problem types
> for fear of leaking sensitive information in the relevant fields of new types.
> 
> There is, however, a difference between 7807 and this document. In 7807
> different problems are identified by "type". In this document, there is no
> explicit type. Instead, there are basic details that are defined, plus a
> registry of standard and custom extra attributes that can be defined. The
> security considerations section in 7807 is phrased in terms of new types.
> Security considerations text written specifically for this documentation would
> not mention new types (which don't exist), but new detail entries.
> 
> Still, the message would be the same. When defining new detail entries, care
> should be taken that they do not leak sensitive information.  Yet because of
> the difference, I believe that the text should be written specifically for this
> document, not just referenced from 7807.
> 
> 
> -- 
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux