Dan, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-3-15, at 12:26, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-02 > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 2022-03-15 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-03-18 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > Ready with Nits > > (this review applies to both Gen-ART and OPSDIR. > > This is an informational document reviewing advantages and disadvantages of the > five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies. > > The document is explicitly targeting network operators, so it is useful and > recommended that operators dealing with one or more of these technologies or > evaluating their introduction read it carefully. I liked Section 4.5 which > includes some very useful Typical Deployment and Traffic Volume Considerations > and Section 5. Performance Considerations. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. I am not sure whether this Informational document needs any of the > capitalized key words as described in BCP14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] mentioned in > Section 1.1 > > 2. Another pass to make sure that acronyms are expanded at first occurrence > would be useful. For exemple: UE in section 2.1 > > 3. It is not clear how Table 2 should be read. What means an X? I guess it is > supposed to say 'it applies, no data model' but this should be explained > > 4. Section 4.4.1 - I am slightly uncomfortable with the URLs for free > open-source implementations being included in the text. Maybe an Appendix would > be a better place. Or at least use informative references. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
